Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018Texas A&M
TE • 6'6" • 265 lbs • Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Trevor Wood reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.7
Efficiency
56.7
Consistency
98
Season Value
48.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trevor Wood, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona. Trevor Wood reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Trevor Wood played TE for Arizona and Texas A&M. Across 5 tracked seasons, Trevor Wood recorded 3 rushing yards, 80 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Arizona.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona paired 49 primary output with 47.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
8.5
Efficiency
56.7
Usage
6.7
Consistency
98
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 8. UAB: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
60 vs UAB
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2014-2017
Opening stop
Texas A&M
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 49 | 47.8 | 8 | 49 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona | 14 | 46.7 | 8.4 | -35 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 14 | 46.7 | 8.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 17 | 56.7 | 6.7 | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
12
Primary metric
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Arizona
49 primary output · 47.8 efficiency · 8 usage
53.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
48.2
17 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 6.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Arizona
31.5
14 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 8.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8826
Milton · Alpharetta, GA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
80
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.