Usage / Role
9%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2018Central Michigan
DL • 6'3" • 305 lbs • Bellevue, WA, USA
Marcus Griffin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.5 disruption score.
Usage / Role
9%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
15
Developing production for a defensive lineman
Reliability
9
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
30
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Arizona
Snapshot
Marcus Griffin, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Arizona. Marcus Griffin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.5 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 1 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 37.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 59.9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 8 | 12 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 19.8 |
Related Context
Marcus Griffin played DL for Arizona and Central Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Marcus Griffin recorded 3 rushing yards and 15 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Arizona paired 2 primary output with 14.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 7.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona, Central Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
7.5
Usage
2.1
Consistency
4.2
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Maine: 0. Michigan State: 0. Buffalo: 1. Western Michigan: 0. Akron: 0. Toledo: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Northern Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Maine: 1 by 4.2. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. Buffalo: 1 by 14.2. Western Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Toledo: 4 by 16.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
16.7 vs Toledo
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2014-2017
Opening stop
Central Michigan
2018
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 2 | 14.2 | 3.1 | 2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1 | 7.5 | 2.1 | -1 |
#1 Featured game
vs Buffalo
Week 6 · L 24-34 · Conference game
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Havoc Plays
63.3 takeover
1 disruption/tackle impact with 63.3 takeover score.
#2
vs Oregon State
Week 11 · W 49-28 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
56.4 takeover
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 56.4 takeover score.
#3
@ UTEP
Week 3 · W 63-16
1
Havoc Plays
36.7 takeover
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
#4
@ Toledo
Week 13 · L 13-51 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
12.2 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 12.2 takeover score.
#5
@ Akron
Week 9 · L 10-17 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
7.2 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 7.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Arizona
2 primary output · 14.2 efficiency · 3.1 usage
59.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Arizona
37.2
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan
19.8
1 primary · 7.5 efficiency · 2.1 usage
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.