Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona paired 2,292 primary output with 64.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona | 5 | 517 | 338 | 179 | 4 | 35.1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 10 | 2,292 | 1,348 | 944 | 18 | 75.9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 7 | 1,191 | 732 | 459 | 13 | 57.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona paired 2,292 primary output with 64.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Primary Metric / G
170.1
Efficiency
67.4
Usage
21
Consistency
63.8
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Arizona: 181. Houston: 204. UTEP: 288. Utah: 338. Colorado: 17. Oregon State: 30. Arizona State: 133
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Arizona: 20 by 77.7. Houston: 42 by 57.4. UTEP: 35 by 85.6. Utah: 60 by 56.9. Colorado: 5 by 35.6. Oregon State: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 18 by 58.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.