Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2014-2018Notre Dame
TE • 6'4" • 245 lbs • Midlothian, IL, USA
Nic Weishar reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.4
Efficiency
26.7
Consistency
63.9
Season Value
29.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nic Weishar, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Nic Weishar reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 47 primary output with 95.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
3.3
Efficiency
26.7
Usage
8.4
Consistency
63.9
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 4. Wake Forest: 0. Stanford: 6
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
40 vs Stanford
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 19 | 42.2 | 5 | 19 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 47 | 95.6 | 5.7 | 28 |
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 52 | 34.7 | 12.7 | 5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 52 | 34.7 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 10 | 26.7 | 8.4 | -42 |
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18
Primary metric
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Stanford
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Temple
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 44.4 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
47 primary output · 95.6 efficiency · 5.7 usage
73.2
#2
2017 Postseason · Notre Dame
52.1
52 primary · 34.7 efficiency · 12.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Notre Dame
52.1
52 primary · 34.7 efficiency · 12.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9059
Marist · Chicago, IL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
128
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Nic Weishar quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit