Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2014-2018UAB
WR • 5'10" • 175 lbs • Alpharetta, GA, USA
Collin Lisa reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.9
Efficiency
80.7
Consistency
46.2
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Collin Lisa, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · UAB. Collin Lisa reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
UAB paired 416 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
32
Efficiency
80.7
Usage
15.9
Consistency
46.2
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 18. Unknown: 93. Coastal Carolina: 15. Tulane: 22. Charlotte: 56. Louisiana Tech: 46. Rice: 21. North Texas: 27. UTEP: 15. UTSA: 41. Southern Miss: 2. Texas A&M: 55. Middle Tennessee: 5
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 1 by 100. Unknown: 10 by 62. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 50. Tulane: 1 by 100. Charlotte: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. Rice: 1 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 90. UTEP: 1 by 100. UTSA: 2 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 13.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 33.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/19 | @ Northern Illinois | W 37-13 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-27 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Texas A&M | L 20-41 | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | W 26-23 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSA | W 52-3 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 19-0 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs North Texas | W 29-21 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Rice | W 42-0 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Tulane | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 24-47 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 10 | 93 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UAB | 9 | 60 | 4.5 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | UAB | 439 | 69.9 | 18 | 430 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 439 | 69.9 | 18 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | UAB | 416 | 80.7 | 15.9 | -23 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 416 | 80.7 | 15.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
93
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 62 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 72.4 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · UAB
416 primary output · 80.7 efficiency · 15.9 usage
60.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · UAB
60.7
416 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · UAB
60.1
439 primary · 69.9 efficiency · 18 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.78
Chattahoochee · Alpharetta, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
864
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Collin Lisa quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit