Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Georgia State paired 3 primary output with 30 efficiency.
Player Stats
Bobby Baker College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 82
- TFL
- 0.5
- Passes defended
- 3
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UAB | 1 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia State | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 62.6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia State | 12 | 82 | 0.5 | 0 | - | 3 | 0 | 45.1 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 31.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, Georgia State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Georgia State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
31.4
Usage
4.6
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 1. Air Force: 1. Wisconsin: 1. App State: 0.5. Texas State: 0. Troy: 0. UT Martin: 0. South Alabama: 0. Arkansas State: 0. UL Monroe: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. Idaho: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 5 by 30.8. Air Force: 7 by 39.2. Wisconsin: 11 by 55.8. App State: 8 by 38.3. Texas State: 5 by 20.8. Troy: 6 by 25. UT Martin: 3 by 12.5. South Alabama: 10 by 41.7. Arkansas State: 4 by 16.7. UL Monroe: 9 by 37.5. Georgia Southern: 6 by 25. Idaho: 8 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 3 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 9 · +0.4 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Bobby Baker
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.