Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2014-2018Arizona State
Renell Wren
DL • 6'6" • 297 lbs • St. Louis, MO, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Renell Wren shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.5
Consistency
38.9
Season Value
22.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
14151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Renell Wren, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Arizona State. Renell Wren shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 10.5 primary output with 21.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 22.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
22.5
Usage
5.2
Consistency
38.9
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 0. UTSA: 1. Michigan State: 0. San Diego State: 1.5. Oregon State: 1. Colorado: 0. Stanford: 2. USC: 0. Utah: 2. Oregon: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 6 by 25. UTSA: 4 by 26.7. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. San Diego State: 6 by 40. Oregon State: 2 by 18.3. Colorado: 3 by 12.5. Stanford: 4 by 36.7. USC: 3 by 12.5. Utah: 2 by 28.3. Oregon: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
40 vs San Diego State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | @ Fresno State | L 20-31 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Oregon | L 29-31 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Utah | W 38-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ USC | W 38-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/19 | vs Stanford | L 13-20 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Colorado | L 21-28 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | vs Oregon State | W 52-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/16 | @ San Diego State | L 21-28 | 6 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Michigan State | W 16-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | vs UTSA | W 49-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 10.5 | 21.5 | 7.3 | 10.5 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona State | 4.5 | 15.8 | 4.8 | -6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona State | 4.5 | 15.8 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arizona State | 7.5 | 22.5 | 5.2 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 7.5 | 22.5 | 5.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 50.7 takeover score.
#2
Washington
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.4 takeover score.
#3
Utah
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#4
Stanford
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#5
San Diego State
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
10.5 primary output · 21.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
25.2
#2
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
22.7
7.5 primary · 22.5 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Arizona State
22.7
7.5 primary · 22.5 efficiency · 5.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8806
Lutheran North · St. Louis, MO
- Committed To
- Arizona State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
73
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.