Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2014-2017Georgia State
Todd Boyd
WR • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Moultrie, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Todd Boyd reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.5
Consistency
53.8
Season Value
47.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Georgia State
1415151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Georgia State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Todd Boyd, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Georgia State. Todd Boyd reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Todd Boyd played WR for Georgia State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Todd Boyd recorded 16 rushing yards, 962 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Georgia State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Georgia State paired 296 primary output with 71.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Georgia State
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
21.7
Efficiency
72.5
Usage
8.2
Consistency
53.8
Best Game by takeover score
Idaho
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 36. Penn State: 32. Charlotte: 12. UL Monroe: 5. Troy: 17. South Alabama: 11. Texas State: 43. App State: 32. Idaho: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 2 by 40. UL Monroe: 1 by 33.3. Troy: 1 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 36.7. Texas State: 3 by 95.6. App State: 2 by 100. Idaho: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins17.8 · Games = 4 · -4.3 vs Losses
Losses22 · Games = 4 · +4.3 vs Wins
First Half20.4 · Games = 5 · -2.9 vs Second Half
Second Half23.3 · Games = 4 · +2.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs App State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/2 | vs Idaho | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs App State | L 10-31 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Texas State | W 33-30 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 34 |
| Thu 10/26 | vs South Alabama | W 21-13 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Troy | L 10-34 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ UL Monroe | W 47-37 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Charlotte | W 28-0 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Penn State | L 0-56 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 18 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Georgia State | 119 | 51.7 | 8.3 | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Georgia State | 296 | 71.5 | 11.7 | 177 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia State | 296 | 71.5 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia State | 352 | 60.2 | 20.7 | 56 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia State | 195 | 72.5 | 8.2 | -157 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Troy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 90.4 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas State
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
San José State
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Georgia State
296 primary output · 71.5 efficiency · 11.7 usage
57.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Georgia State
57.3
296 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Georgia State
54.5
352 primary · 60.2 efficiency · 20.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7483
Colquitt County · Moultrie, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
962
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.