Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Northern Illinois paired 589 primary output with 75.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Iowa State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | Iowa State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Iowa State | 5 | 10 | 107 | 0 | 43.4 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Iowa State | 10 | 30 | 301 | 2 | 55 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 9 | 2 | 109 | 1 | 43.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 9 | 8 | 141 | 2 | 43.7 |
| 2018 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 14 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 79.9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 14 | 49 | 585 | 2 | 79.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Northern Illinois paired 589 primary output with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Iowa State, Northern Illinois.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
42.1
Efficiency
75.4
Usage
21.8
Consistency
71.7
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 4. Iowa: 43. Utah: 73. Central Michigan: 8. Florida State: 35. Eastern Michigan: 76. Ball State: 23. Ohio: 61. BYU: 70. Akron: 50. Toledo: 34. Miami (OH): 38. Western Michigan: 32. Buffalo: 42
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 1 by 26.7. Iowa: 4 by 71.7. Utah: 8 by 60.8. Central Michigan: 2 by 26.7. Florida State: 3 by 77.8. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 63.3. Ball State: 2 by 76.7. Ohio: 6 by 67.8. BYU: 4 by 100. Akron: 3 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 84.4. Western Michigan: 2 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.