Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2014-2016Indiana
TE • 6'6" • Queens, NY, USA
Jordan Fuchs reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6
Efficiency
63.3
Consistency
54.5
Season Value
54.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Indiana
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Fuchs, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Indiana. Jordan Fuchs reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Indiana paired 38 primary output with 63.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 63.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
12.7
Efficiency
63.3
Usage
6
Consistency
54.5
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 9. Penn State: 20. Rutgers: 9
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 1 by 60. Penn State: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 30
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Indiana | 31 | 60 | 10.7 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Indiana | 38 | 63.3 | 6 | 7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | -38 |
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Primary metric
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
North Texas
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 30 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Indiana
38 primary output · 63.3 efficiency · 6 usage
54.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · Indiana
50.5
31 primary · 60 efficiency · 10.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Indiana
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8026
Christ the King · Middle Village, NY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
69
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Fuchs quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit