Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2014-2018Boise State
Sean Modster
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Mission Viejo, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Sean Modster reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.9
Consistency
65
Season Value
68.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Boise State
14151616171718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Boise State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sean Modster, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Boise State. Sean Modster reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Boise State paired 978 primary output with 84.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Boise State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.2
Efficiency
84.9
Usage
23.2
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 167. UConn: 74. Oklahoma State: 56. Wyoming: 88. San Diego State: 44. Nevada: 51. Colorado State: 61. Air Force: 101. BYU: 18. Fresno State: 63. New Mexico: 129. Utah State: 81. Fresno State: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 7 by 100. UConn: 6 by 82.2. Oklahoma State: 4 by 93.3. Wyoming: 7 by 83.8. San Diego State: 4 by 73.3. Nevada: 6 by 56.7. Colorado State: 3 by 100. Air Force: 6 by 100. BYU: 2 by 60. Fresno State: 5 by 84. New Mexico: 9 by 95.6. Utah State: 5 by 100. Fresno State: 4 by 75
Split Comparison
Wins83.3 · n=10 · +35.0 vs Losses
Losses48.3 · n=3 · -35.0 vs Wins
First Half77.3 · n=7 · +4.5 vs Second Half
Second Half72.8 · n=6 · -4.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Troy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/2 | vs Fresno State | L 16-19 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs Utah State | W 33-24 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-14 | — | 9 | 129 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 3 | 18 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Fresno State | W 24-17 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 11/4 | vs BYU | W 21-16 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Air Force100 receiving yards | W 48-38 | — | 6 | 101 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Colorado State2+ TD | W 56-28 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sun 10/14 | @ Nevada | W 31-27 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs San Diego State | L 13-19 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Wyoming | W 34-14 | — | 7 | 88 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Oklahoma State | L 21-44 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs UConn | W 62-7 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Troy100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-20 | — | 7 | 167 | 23.9 | 23.90 | 2 | 54 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boise State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016201720172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Boise State | 39 | 86.7 | 4.9 | 39 |
| 2016 Postseason | Boise State | 135 | 90.8 | 8.1 | 96 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Boise State | 135 | 90.8 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Boise State | 335 | 59.2 | 11.7 | 200 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Boise State | 335 | 59.2 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Boise State | 978 | 84.9 | 23.2 | 643 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Troy
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
167
Primary metric
167 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado State
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Boise State
978 primary output · 84.9 efficiency · 23.2 usage
68.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Boise State
47.8
39 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Boise State
38.8
135 primary · 90.8 efficiency · 8.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8089
Santa Margarita Catholic · Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
- Committed To
- Boise State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,487
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.