Usage Score
12.7
Player Dossier
2012-2018Boise State
TE • 6'5" • 240 lbs • Holtville, CA, USA
David Lucero reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.7
Efficiency
72.9
Consistency
34.9
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Lucero, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP. David Lucero reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTEP paired 322 primary output with 72.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Boise State, UTEP.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
29.3
Efficiency
72.9
Usage
12.7
Consistency
34.9
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 20. UNLV: 26. Tennessee: 4. UTSA: 6. North Texas: 14. Louisiana Tech: 22. UAB: 11. Rice: 28. Middle Tennessee: 62. Western Kentucky: 118. Southern Miss: 11
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 66.7. UNLV: 2 by 86.7. Tennessee: 1 by 26.7. UTSA: 1 by 40. North Texas: 1 by 93.3. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 48.9. UAB: 1 by 73.3. Rice: 2 by 93.3. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 100. Western Kentucky: 2 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 73.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-39 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Western Kentucky100 receiving yards | L 16-40 | — | 2 | 118 | 59 | 59 | 1 | 88 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 32-48 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Rice | W 34-26 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs UAB | L 0-19 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 24-31 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs North Texas | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UTSA | L 21-30 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Tennessee | L 0-24 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ UNLV | L 24-52 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Boise State
2012-2015
Opening stop
UTEP
2017-2018
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Boise State | 63 | 81.7 | 4 | 63 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 129 | 57.5 | 17.5 | 66 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 322 | 72.9 | 12.7 | 193 |
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118
Primary metric
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico State
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
#5
Wyoming
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
322 primary output · 72.9 efficiency · 12.7 usage
54.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
46.6
129 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Boise State
45
63 primary · 81.7 efficiency · 4 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8378
Holtville · Holtville, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
514
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
David Lucero quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit