Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2014-2018Rutgers
DB • 6'1" • 203 lbs • Kissimmee, FL, USA
Isaiah Wharton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.6
Efficiency
33.8
Consistency
35.7
Season Value
26.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Wharton, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers. Isaiah Wharton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.8 disruption score.
Isaiah Wharton played DB for Rutgers. Across 5 tracked seasons, Isaiah Wharton recorded 141 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Rutgers.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 33.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
33.8
Usage
9.6
Consistency
35.7
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 1. Ohio State: 1. Kansas: 2. Buffalo: 1. Indiana: 1. Illinois: 0. Maryland: 0. Northwestern: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Michigan: 1. Penn State: 4. Michigan State: 3.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 6 by 35. Ohio State: 6 by 35. Kansas: 4 by 36.7. Buffalo: 3 by 22.5. Indiana: 6 by 35. Illinois: 2 by 8.3. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Northwestern: 6 by 35. Wisconsin: 7 by 29.2. Michigan: 7 by 39.2. Penn State: 3 by 52.5. Michigan State: 8 by 68.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
68.3 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Michigan State | L 10-14 | 8 | 6 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Penn State | L 7-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Michigan | L 7-42 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-31 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Northwestern | L 15-18 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Maryland | L 7-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Illinois | L 17-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Indiana | L 17-24 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Buffalo | L 13-42 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas | L 14-55 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Ohio State | L 3-52 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Texas State | W 35-7 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 11 | 24.8 | 4.6 | 10 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rutgers | 6.5 | 17.9 | 2.9 | -4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rutgers | 15.5 | 33.8 | 9.6 | 9 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Michigan State
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#3
Penn State
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
26.1
15.5 primary · 33.8 efficiency · 9.6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
25.6
11 primary · 24.8 efficiency · 4.6 usage
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7683
Gateway · Kissimmee, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
141
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.