Usage Score
3.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018Oregon State
Jonathan Willis
LB • 6'1" • 232 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jonathan Willis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16 disruption score.
Efficiency
16
Consistency
6.1
Season Value
7.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Oregon State
1415161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Oregon State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Willis, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Oregon State. Jonathan Willis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Oregon State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 16 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Oregon State
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
16
Usage
3.7
Consistency
6.1
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 0. Unknown: 2. Nevada: 0. Arizona: 0. Arizona State: 0. Washington State: 0. California: 0. USC: 0. Stanford: 0. Washington: 1. Oregon: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 6 by 45. Nevada: 4 by 16.7. Arizona: 4 by 16.7. Arizona State: 4 by 16.7. Washington State: 2 by 8.3. California: 3 by 12.5. USC: 1 by 4.2. Stanford: 1 by 4.2. Washington: 1 by 14.2. Oregon: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0.1 · Games = 10
First Half0.3 · Games = 6 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs First Half
All Games0.3 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
45 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Oregon | L 15-55 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Washington | L 23-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Stanford | L 17-48 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/4 | vs USC | L 21-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs California | L 7-49 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/7 | vs Washington State | L 37-56 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Arizona State | L 24-52 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Arizona | L 14-35 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Nevada | L 35-37 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Ohio State | L 31-77 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Oregon State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oregon State | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oregon State | 2 | 14.3 | 7.5 | 2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oregon State | 11 | 32.8 | 12.1 | 9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oregon State | 3 | 16 | 3.7 | -8 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 73.7 takeover score.
#2
Colorado
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 64.4 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.7 takeover score.
#4
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40.4 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Oregon State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2017 Regular Season · Oregon State
20.9
11 primary · 32.8 efficiency · 12.1 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Oregon State
8
2 primary · 14.3 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8044
Booker T. Washington · Tulsa, OK
- Committed To
- Oregon State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
129
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.