Usage Score
12.3
Player Dossier
2014-2018Washington
TE • 6'5" • 261 lbs • Bellevue, WA, USA
Drew Sample reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.3
Efficiency
58.5
Consistency
52.8
Season Value
55.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Washington
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Sample, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Washington. Drew Sample reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Drew Sample played TE for Washington. Across 5 tracked seasons, Drew Sample recorded 480 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Washington.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Washington paired 245 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
20.4
Efficiency
58.5
Usage
12.3
Consistency
52.8
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 1. Auburn: 26. Unknown: 25. Utah: 0. Arizona State: 24. BYU: 37. UCLA: 0. Oregon: 79. California: 6. Stanford: 19. Oregon State: 4. Utah: 24
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 2 by 3.3. Auburn: 2 by 86.7. Unknown: 3 by 55.6. Arizona State: 2 by 80. BYU: 5 by 49.3. Oregon: 4 by 100. California: 1 by 40. Stanford: 2 by 63.3. Oregon State: 1 by 26.7. Utah: 2 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Ohio State | L 23-28 | — | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Utah | W 10-3 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Oregon State | W 42-23 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/4 | vs Stanford | W 27-23 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ California | L 10-12 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Oregon | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ UCLA | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | vs BYU | W 35-7 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Arizona State | W 27-20 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ Utah | W 21-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Auburn | L 16-21 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Washington
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Washington | 45 | 55 | 5.7 | 45 |
| 2016 Postseason | Washington | 106 | 62.9 | 7.4 | 61 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington | 106 | 62.9 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Washington | 84 | 48 | 8.3 | -22 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Washington | 84 | 48 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Washington | 245 | 58.5 | 12.3 | 161 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Washington | 245 | 58.5 | 12.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79
Primary metric
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
California
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Washington
245 primary output · 58.5 efficiency · 12.3 usage
55.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Washington
55.5
245 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Washington
40.6
106 primary · 62.9 efficiency · 7.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8707
Episcopal · Alexandria, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
480
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.