Player Stats

JoJo McIntosh College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
171
TFL
2.5
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonWashington00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonWashington10-0--047.4
2016 PostseasonWashington13820--044
2016 Regular SeasonWashington13590.50-2044
2017 PostseasonWashington127-0--024.7
2017 Regular SeasonWashington1243-0-1024.7
2018 PostseasonWashington135-0--023.8
2018 Regular SeasonWashington1349-0-2023.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Washington paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 18.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Auburn

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Washington

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.2

Efficiency

18.9

Usage

3.2

Consistency

5.1

Best Game by takeover score

Auburn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 0. Auburn: 1. North Dakota: 0. Utah: 1. Arizona State: 0. BYU: 0. UCLA: 0. Oregon: 0. Colorado: 0. California: 0. Stanford: 0. Washington State: 0. Utah: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 5 by 20.8. Auburn: 7 by 39.2. North Dakota: 3 by 12.5. Utah: 6 by 35. Arizona State: 7 by 29.2. BYU: 3 by 12.5. UCLA: 3 by 12.5. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. Colorado: 3 by 12.5. California: 7 by 29.2. Stanford: 1 by 4.2. Washington State: 2 by 8.3. Utah: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.1 · Games = 9 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · +0.1 vs Wins