Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2014-2018Alabama
Christian Miller
LB • 6'4" • 244 lbs • Columbia, SC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Christian Miller shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.4
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
35.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Alabama
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Miller, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Alabama. Christian Miller shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Alabama paired 20 primary output with 24.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Alabama
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
24.4
Usage
8.4
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 2. Louisville: 0.5. Arkansas State: 0. Ole Miss: 5. Texas A&M: 2.5. Louisiana: 2. Arkansas: 0. Missouri: 2.5. Tennessee: 2. LSU: 2. Mississippi State: 1. Unknown: 0.5. Auburn: 0. Georgia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 24.2. Louisville: 1 by 9.2. Arkansas State: 2 by 8.3. Ole Miss: 5 by 70.8. Texas A&M: 4 by 41.7. Louisiana: 4 by 36.7. Arkansas: 1 by 4.2. Missouri: 3 by 37.5. Tennessee: 2 by 28.3. LSU: 1 by 24.2. Mississippi State: 1 by 14.2. Unknown: 4 by 21.7. Auburn: 2 by 8.3. Georgia: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.5 · n=13
First Half1.7 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=7 · -0.6 vs First Half
All Games1.4 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/30 | vs Oklahoma | W 45-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Georgia | W 35-28 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Auburn | W 52-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Mississippi State | W 24-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/4 | @ LSU | W 29-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Tennessee | W 58-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Missouri | W 39-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Arkansas | W 65-31 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Louisiana | W 56-14 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Texas A&M | W 45-23 | 4 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Ole Miss2+ sacks · Splash game | W 62-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Arkansas State | W 57-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | vs Louisville | W 51-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Alabama | 4.5 | 12.4 | 3.7 | 4.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 4.5 | 12.4 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Alabama | 3 | 13.8 | 3.7 | -1.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 3 | 13.8 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Alabama | 20 | 24.4 | 8.4 | 17 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 20 | 24.4 | 8.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.8 takeover score.
#2
Western Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.4 takeover score.
#3
Georgia
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
#4
Texas A&M
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 34.1 takeover score.
#5
Missouri
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 32.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Alabama
20 primary output · 24.4 efficiency · 8.4 usage
35.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Alabama
35.7
20 primary · 24.4 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Alabama
16.3
3 primary · 13.8 efficiency · 3.7 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9804
Spring Valley · Columbia, SC
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
56
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.