Usage Score
3.9
Player Dossier
2014-2018Kentucky
DT • 6'3" • 298 lbs • Bowling Green, KY, USA
Adrian Middleton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.9
Efficiency
11.3
Consistency
14.8
Season Value
11.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adrian Middleton, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Kentucky. Adrian Middleton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.3 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Kentucky paired 5.5 primary output with 15.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 11.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
11.3
Usage
3.9
Consistency
14.8
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Florida: 1. Mississippi State: 0. Texas A&M: 1. Vanderbilt: 2. Missouri: 0. Georgia: 0. Middle Tennessee: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 1 by 4.2. Central Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Florida: 1 by 14.2. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Texas A&M: 1 by 14.2. Vanderbilt: 1 by 24.2. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Georgia: 1 by 4.2. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 28.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
28.3 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Penn State | W 27-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 34-23 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Georgia | L 17-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Missouri | W 15-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Vanderbilt | W 14-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Mississippi State | W 28-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Florida | W 27-16 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Central Michigan | W 35-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kentucky
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kentucky | 5.5 | 15.4 | 5.3 | 5.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 5.5 | 15.4 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Kentucky | 5 | 14 | 2.9 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kentucky | 5 | 14 | 2.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Kentucky | 6 | 11.3 | 3.9 | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kentucky | 6 | 11.3 | 3.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
#2
Tennessee
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.1 takeover score.
#4
Vanderbilt
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#5
Louisville
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Kentucky
5.5 primary output · 15.4 efficiency · 5.3 usage
13.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Kentucky
13.1
5.5 primary · 15.4 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Kentucky
11.9
6 primary · 11.3 efficiency · 3.9 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8664
South Warren · Bowling Green, KY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
70
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Adrian Middleton quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit