Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2014-2018Tulsa
Justin Hobbs
WR • 6'4" • 230 lbs • Overland Park, KS, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Justin Hobbs reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.4
Consistency
66.1
Season Value
55.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
14151516161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Hobbs, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa. Justin Hobbs reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 830 primary output with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
43.6
Efficiency
74.4
Usage
24.3
Consistency
66.1
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 61. Texas: 13. Arkansas State: 22. Temple: 78. Houston: 82. Arkansas: 12. Tulane: 25. UConn: 45. Memphis: 59. Navy: 23. SMU: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. Texas: 2 by 43.3. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Temple: 9 by 57.8. Houston: 4 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 40. Tulane: 4 by 41.7. UConn: 2 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 78.7. Navy: 2 by 76.7. SMU: 5 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins52.5 · n=2 · +13.3 vs Losses
Losses39.3 · n=8 · -13.3 vs Wins
First Half44.7 · n=6 · +2.3 vs Second Half
Second Half42.4 · n=5 · -2.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs SMU | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Navy | L 29-37 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Memphis | L 21-47 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UConn | W 49-19 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Tulane | L 17-24 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Arkansas | L 0-23 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 10/5 | @ Houston | L 26-41 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Thu 9/20 | @ TempleHigh volume | L 17-31 | — | 9 | 78 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Arkansas State | L 20-29 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Texas | L 21-28 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 1 | 49 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520152016201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Tulsa | 551 | 92.9 | 13.2 | 551 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 551 | 92.9 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 685 | 76.3 | 19.3 | 134 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 685 | 76.3 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 830 | 85.7 | 38 | 145 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 480 | 74.4 | 24.3 | -350 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Primary metric
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
141
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
129
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Navy
123
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
830 primary output · 85.7 efficiency · 38 usage
73.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
55.6
480 primary · 74.4 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Tulsa
55.2
551 primary · 92.9 efficiency · 13.2 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7593
Shawnee Mission West · Overland Park, KS
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,546
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.