Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2014-2016Tulane
Trey Scott
WR • 6'1" • Powder Springs, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Trey Scott reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
46.7
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
20
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Tulane
141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trey Scott, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Tulane. Trey Scott reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Tulane paired 205 primary output with 65.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
4.7
Efficiency
46.7
Usage
15.4
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Charlotte
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/16 | @ Charlotte | — | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulane | 76 | 56.7 | 5.9 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulane | 205 | 65.2 | 10.5 | 129 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulane | 14 | 46.7 | 15.4 | -191 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
15
Primary metric
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UConn
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Tulane
205 primary output · 65.2 efficiency · 10.5 usage
53.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · Tulane
43.4
76 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Tulane
20
14 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 15.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7619
McEachern · Powder Springs, GA
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
295
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.