Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2014-2018East Carolina
WR • 6'4" • 200 lbs • Charleston, SC, USA
Terrell Green reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.8
Efficiency
73.2
Consistency
59.8
Season Value
60.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · East Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terrell Green, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · East Carolina. Terrell Green reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
East Carolina paired 285 primary output with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
28.5
Efficiency
73.2
Usage
10.8
Consistency
59.8
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 85. South Florida: 27. Old Dominion: 0. Temple: 9. Houston: 41. UCF: 17. Memphis: 6. Tulane: 30. UConn: 38. Cincinnati: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 10 by 56.7. South Florida: 3 by 60. Temple: 1 by 60. Houston: 3 by 91.1. UCF: 1 by 100. Memphis: 1 by 40. Tulane: 3 by 66.7. UConn: 3 by 84.4. Cincinnati: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | @ Cincinnati | L 6-56 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs UConn | W 55-21 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Tulane | L 18-24 | — | 3 | 30 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Memphis | L 41-59 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs UCF | L 10-37 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Houston | L 20-42 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Temple | L 6-49 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Old Dominion | W 37-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/23 | @ South Florida | L 13-20 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 10 | 85 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
East Carolina
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | East Carolina | 8 | 53.3 | 4.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | -8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | East Carolina | 78 | 70.9 | 5.2 | 78 |
| 2017 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | 0 | -78 |
| 2018 Regular Season | East Carolina | 285 | 73.2 | 10.8 | 285 |
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28
Primary metric
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
85
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#4
Temple
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · East Carolina
285 primary output · 73.2 efficiency · 10.8 usage
60.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · East Carolina
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · East Carolina
45.1
78 primary · 70.9 efficiency · 5.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7883
Hanahan · Charleston, SC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
371
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Terrell Green quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit