Usage Score
34
Player Dossier
2014-2017Toledo
Terry Swanson
RB • 5'10" • 205 lbs • Aliquippa, PA, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Terry Swanson leans workhorse runner traits and 57.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
57.7
Consistency
76.1
Season Value
66.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo
14151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terry Swanson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo. Terry Swanson leans workhorse runner traits and 57.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Toledo paired 1,557 primary output with 57.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
119.8
Efficiency
57.7
Usage
34
Consistency
76.1
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 70. Unknown: 64. Nevada: 117. Tulsa: 142. Miami: 90. Central Michigan: 151. Akron: 152. Ball State: 105. Northern Illinois: 119. Ohio: 17. Bowling Green: 193. Western Michigan: 151. Akron: 186
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 14 by 45.8. Unknown: 13 by 41. Nevada: 29 by 40.2. Tulsa: 20 by 75.3. Miami: 21 by 42.5. Central Michigan: 24 by 65.6. Akron: 22 by 67.2. Ball State: 11 by 89.8. Northern Illinois: 30 by 41.5. Ohio: 7 by 19.5. Bowling Green: 24 by 83.5. Western Michigan: 25 by 53.1. Akron: 22 by 85.2
Split Comparison
Wins146.2 · n=9 · +87.2 vs Losses
Losses59 · n=3 · -87.2 vs Wins
First Half112.3 · n=7 · -16.2 vs Second Half
Second Half128.5 · n=6 · +16.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
89.8 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/24 | vs App State | L 0-34 | 11 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 5 |
| Sat 12/2 | vs Akron100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 45-28 | 21 | 180 | 8.60 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 8.5 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Western Michigan150 scrimmage yards | W 37-10 | 21 | 94 | 4.50 | 1 | 4 | 57 | 6.0 |
| Thu 11/16 | @ Bowling Green100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 66-37 | 23 | 192 | 8.30 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.0 |
| Thu 11/9 | @ Ohio | L 10-38 | 6 | 9 | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2.4 |
| Thu 11/2 | vs Northern Illinois100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 27-17 | 29 | 116 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4.0 |
| Thu 10/26 | @ Ball State100 rush yards | W 58-17 | 11 | 105 | 9.50 | 1 | — | — | 9.5 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Akron100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-21 | 20 | 123 | 6.20 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 6.9 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Central Michigan100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-10 | 23 | 145 | 6.30 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Miami | L 30-52 | 20 | 79 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4.3 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Tulsa100 rush yards | W 54-51 | 19 | 139 | 7.30 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7.1 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Nevada100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 37-24 | 27 | 101 | 3.70 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 4.0 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | 11 | 36 | 3.30 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 4.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 885 | 68 | 17.3 | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 994 | 60.8 | 22.5 | 109 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 994 | 60.8 | 22.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 657 | 53.2 | 15.1 | -337 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 657 | 53.2 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 1,557 | 57.7 | 34 | 900 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,557 | 57.7 | 34 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with 226 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
226
Primary metric
226 scrimmage yards and 44 usage.
#2
Kent State
161
Primary metric
Win with 161 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
161 scrimmage yards and 21.5 usage.
#3
Bowling Green
193
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
193 scrimmage yards and 35.8 usage.
#4
Akron
186
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
186 scrimmage yards and 35.5 usage.
#5
Bowling Green
132
Primary metric
Win with 132 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
132 scrimmage yards and 19.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Toledo
1,557 primary output · 57.7 efficiency · 34 usage
66.9
#2
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
66.9
1,557 primary · 57.7 efficiency · 34 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Toledo
54
994 primary · 60.8 efficiency · 22.5 usage
Milestones
17
100+ rush yards
8
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7986
Aliquippa · Aliquippa, PA
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
4,093
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.