Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2014-2018Toledo
LB • 6'2" • 245 lbs • Downers Grove, IL, USA
Richard Olekanma shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.8
Efficiency
36.2
Consistency
32.7
Season Value
23
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Richard Olekanma, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Toledo. Richard Olekanma shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Toledo paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 36.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
36.2
Usage
8.8
Consistency
32.7
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 0.5. Unknown: 0.5. Miami: 0. Nevada: 1. Fresno State: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1.5. Buffalo: 1. Western Michigan: 1.5. Ball State: 3. Northern Illinois: 0. Kent State: 0.5. Central Michigan: 3
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 8 by 38.3. Unknown: 2 by 13.3. Miami: 7 by 29.2. Nevada: 1 by 14.2. Fresno State: 5 by 20.8. Bowling Green: 8 by 33.3. Eastern Michigan: 15 by 65. Buffalo: 9 by 47.5. Western Michigan: 9 by 52.5. Ball State: 5 by 50.8. Northern Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Kent State: 4 by 21.7. Central Michigan: 8 by 63.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
65 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/21 | vs Florida International | L 32-35 | 8 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central MichiganSplash game | W 51-13 | 8 | 8 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Kent State | W 56-34 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/8 | @ Northern Illinois | L 15-38 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Ball StateSplash game | W 45-13 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Western Michigan | W 51-24 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Buffalo | L 17-31 | 9 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Eastern Michigan10+ tackles | L 26-28 | 15 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Bowling Green | W 52-36 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Fresno State | L 27-49 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nevada | W 63-44 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Miami | L 24-49 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 1 | 23.8 | 4.8 | 1 |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 6 | 17.7 | 4.4 | 5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 6 | 17.7 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 12.5 | 36.2 | 8.8 | 6.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 12.5 | 36.2 | 8.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.9 takeover score.
#2
Ball State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.4 takeover score.
#3
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 43.9 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Toledo
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2018 Postseason · Toledo
23
12.5 primary · 36.2 efficiency · 8.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Toledo
23
12.5 primary · 36.2 efficiency · 8.8 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7733
Downers Grove North · Downers Grove, IL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
140
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Richard Olekanma quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit