Player Stats

Jon'Vea Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,224
Receptions
123
Touchdowns
24

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonToledo111029.7
2015 Regular SeasonToledo68101045.8
2016 PostseasonToledo12222066.5
2016 Regular SeasonToledo12387511066.5
2017 PostseasonToledo13114073.6
2017 Regular SeasonToledo1341675573.6
2018 PostseasonToledo13349273.9
2018 Regular SeasonToledo1329611773.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Toledo paired 660 primary output with 93.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 93.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Toledo

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

50.8

Efficiency

93.6

Usage

14.7

Consistency

67.6

Best Game by takeover score

Fresno State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 49. VMI: 80. Miami: 18. Nevada: 38. Fresno State: 112. Bowling Green: 37. Eastern Michigan: 47. Buffalo: 19. Western Michigan: 56. Ball State: 8. Northern Illinois: 54. Kent State: 55. Central Michigan: 87

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 3 by 100. VMI: 3 by 100. Miami: 1 by 100. Nevada: 1 by 100. Fresno State: 6 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 100. Ball State: 2 by 26.7. Northern Illinois: 4 by 90. Kent State: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins51.6 · Games = 7 · +1.7 vs Losses
Losses49.8 · Games = 6 · -1.7 vs Wins