Usage Score
18
Player Dossier
2014-2017Toledo
Olasunkanmi Adeniyi
DE • 6'2" • 248 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
High-volume tacklerDown-to-down presence
Olasunkanmi Adeniyi shows a high-volume tackler profile with 40.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
40.4
Consistency
63.8
Season Value
42.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Olasunkanmi Adeniyi, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Toledo. Olasunkanmi Adeniyi shows a high-volume tackler profile with 40.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Toledo paired 29.5 primary output with 40.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Toledo
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2.1
Efficiency
40.4
Usage
18
Consistency
63.8
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 0.5. Unknown: 1. Nevada: 1. Tulsa: 2.5. Miami: 2. Eastern Michigan: 2.5. Central Michigan: 0. Akron: 2. Ball State: 5. Northern Illinois: 2. Ohio: 2. Bowling Green: 3. Western Michigan: 1. Akron: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 3 by 17.5. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Nevada: 5 by 30.8. Tulsa: 8 by 58.3. Miami: 2 by 28.3. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Akron: 4 by 36.7. Ball State: 3 by 62.5. Northern Illinois: 10 by 61.7. Ohio: 10 by 61.7. Bowling Green: 2 by 38.3. Western Michigan: 3 by 22.5. Akron: 6 by 75
Split Comparison
Wins2.4 · n=10 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · n=3 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · n=7 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half2.9 · n=7 · +1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
75 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/24 | vs App State | L 0-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | vs Akron2+ sacks · Splash game | W 45-28 | 6 | 5 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Western Michigan | W 37-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/16 | @ Bowling GreenSplash game | W 66-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | @ Ohio10+ tackles | L 10-38 | 10 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/2 | vs Northern Illinois10+ tackles | W 27-17 | 10 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/26 | @ Ball State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 58-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Akron | W 48-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Central Michigan | W 30-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 20-15 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ MiamiSplash game | L 30-52 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Tulsa | W 54-51 | 8 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Nevada | W 37-24 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 12 | 24.9 | 7.6 | 12 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 12 | 24.9 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 29.5 | 40.4 | 18 | 17.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 29.5 | 40.4 | 18 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.1 takeover score.
#2
Arkansas State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 64.7 takeover score.
#3
Ball State
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.3 takeover score.
#4
Bowling Green
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#5
Ohio
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Toledo
29.5 primary output · 40.4 efficiency · 18 usage
42.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
42.3
29.5 primary · 40.4 efficiency · 18 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Toledo
16.1
12 primary · 24.9 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
6
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7733
Fort Bend Bush · Richmond, TX
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
114
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.