Player Stats

Papi White College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,620
Receptions
161
Touchdowns
25

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonOhio117041.3
2015 PostseasonOhio8432058.4
2015 Regular SeasonOhio817291358.4
2016 PostseasonOhio12464168.5
2016 Regular SeasonOhio1237608868.5
2017 PostseasonOhio94106182.4
2017 Regular SeasonOhio932525282.4
2018 PostseasonOhio13490089.1
2018 Regular SeasonOhio13588971089.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Ohio paired 987 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Howard

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Ohio

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

75.9

Efficiency

85.2

Usage

34.1

Consistency

71.2

Best Game by takeover score

Howard

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 90. Howard: 154. Virginia: 131. Cincinnati: 23. Massachusetts: 84. Kent State: 89. Northern Illinois: 59. Bowling Green: 92. Ball State: 35. Western Michigan: 39. Miami (OH): 44. Buffalo: 84. Akron: 63

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 4 by 100. Howard: 8 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 76.7. Massachusetts: 6 by 93.3. Kent State: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 6 by 65.6. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Ball State: 3 by 77.8. Western Michigan: 4 by 65. Miami (OH): 5 by 58.7. Buffalo: 8 by 70. Akron: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins81.1 · Games = 9 · +16.9 vs Losses
Losses64.3 · Games = 4 · -16.9 vs Wins