Usage Score
34.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Ohio
Papi White
WR • 5'9" • 168 lbs • Seminole, OK, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Papi White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.2
Consistency
71.2
Season Value
72.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio
141515161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Papi White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio. Papi White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Ohio paired 987 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Ohio
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.9
Efficiency
85.2
Usage
34.1
Consistency
71.2
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 90. Unknown: 154. Virginia: 131. Cincinnati: 23. Massachusetts: 84. Kent State: 89. Northern Illinois: 59. Bowling Green: 92. Ball State: 35. Western Michigan: 39. Miami (OH): 44. Buffalo: 84. Akron: 63
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 4 by 100. Unknown: 8 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 76.7. Massachusetts: 6 by 93.3. Kent State: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 6 by 65.6. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Ball State: 3 by 77.8. Western Michigan: 4 by 65. Miami (OH): 5 by 58.7. Buffalo: 8 by 70. Akron: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins72 · n=8 · +7.8 vs Losses
Losses64.3 · n=4 · -7.8 vs Wins
First Half90 · n=7 · +30.5 vs Second Half
Second Half59.5 · n=6 · -30.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs San Diego State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/20 | vs San Diego State | W 27-0 | — | 4 | 90 | 20.8 | 22.50 | 0 | 54 |
| Fri 11/23 | vs Akron | W 49-28 | — | 3 | 63 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 35 |
| Thu 11/15 | vs BuffaloHigh volume | W 52-17 | — | 8 | 84 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 27 |
| Thu 11/8 | @ Miami (OH) | L 28-30 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Thu 11/1 | @ Western Michigan | W 59-14 | — | 4 | 39 | 6.4 | 9.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Thu 10/25 | vs Ball State | W 52-14 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Bowling Green2+ TD | W 49-14 | — | 2 | 92 | 36.3 | 46 | 2 | 76 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Northern Illinois | L 21-24 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Kent State | W 27-26 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Massachusetts2+ TD | W 58-42 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Cincinnati | L 30-34 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Virginia100 receiving yards | L 31-45 | — | 6 | 131 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 154 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 47 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 7 | 46.7 | 5.3 | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio | 323 | 80 | 15.1 | 316 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 323 | 80 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 672 | 78 | 19.7 | 349 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 672 | 78 | 19.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio | 631 | 90.8 | 31.3 | -41 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio | 631 | 90.8 | 31.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio | 987 | 85.2 | 34.1 | 356 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio | 987 | 85.2 | 34.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
154
Primary metric
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Purdue
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Ohio
987 primary output · 85.2 efficiency · 34.1 usage
72.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Ohio
72.6
987 primary · 85.2 efficiency · 34.1 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Ohio
66.4
631 primary · 90.8 efficiency · 31.3 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7333
Seminole · Ada, OK
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,620
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.