Player Stats

Christian Blake College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
972
Receptions
83
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 PostseasonNorthern Illinois2115051.8
2014 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois2214051.8
2015 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois5544028.8
2016 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois1234457374
2017 PostseasonNorthern Illinois13328065.2
2017 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois1338414465.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

Northern Illinois paired 457 primary output with 80.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 66.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: San Diego State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Northern Illinois

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

34

Efficiency

66.8

Usage

19.1

Consistency

33.8

Best Game by takeover score

San Diego State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 28. Boston College: 0. Eastern Illinois: 24. Nebraska: 77. San Diego State: 153. Kent State: 7. Buffalo: 18. Bowling Green: 17. Eastern Michigan: 39. Toledo: 16. Ball State: 27. Western Michigan: 10. Central Michigan: 26

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 3 by 62.2. Eastern Illinois: 3 by 53.3. Nebraska: 5 by 100. San Diego State: 12 by 85. Kent State: 2 by 23.3. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 3 by 37.8. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 86.7. Toledo: 2 by 53.3. Ball State: 2 by 90. Western Michigan: 1 by 66.7. Central Michigan: 4 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins27.4 · Games = 8 · -17.2 vs Losses
Losses44.6 · Games = 5 · +17.2 vs Wins