Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2016Cincinnati
RB • 5'9" • Lawrenceburg, IN, USA
Chad Banschbach leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.9 efficiency.
Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
26
Developing production for a back
Reliability
28
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
31
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Chad Banschbach, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Chad Banschbach leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.9 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 2 | 81 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 61.1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 2 | 88 | 72 | 16 | 0 | 53.6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 6 | 38 | 27 | 11 | 0 | 37.9 |
Related Context
Chad Banschbach played RB for Cincinnati. Across 3 tracked seasons, Chad Banschbach recorded 180 rushing yards, 27 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 81 primary output with 47.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 23 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Scrimmage Yards / G
44
Efficiency
23
Usage
14.5
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: -3. UCF: 91
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
46 vs UCF
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 81 | 47.3 | 12.6 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 88 | 23 | 14.5 | 7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 38 | 33.9 | 3.7 | -50 |
#1 Featured game
vs UCF
Week 9 · W 52-7 · Conference game
Win with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
91
Scrimmage Yards
74.9 takeover
91 scrimmage yards and 27.5 usage.
#2
@ SMU
Week 8 · W 41-3 · Conference game
58
Scrimmage Yards
68.6 takeover
Win with 58 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
58 scrimmage yards and 15.9 usage.
#3
vs Miami (OH)
Week 4 · W 27-20
11
Scrimmage Yards
55 takeover
Win with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 2.7 usage.
#4
vs BYU
Week 10 · L 3-20
11
Scrimmage Yards
50 takeover
Loss with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.
#5
@ UCF
Week 11 · L 3-24 · Conference game
10
Scrimmage Yards
44.9 takeover
Loss with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
10 scrimmage yards and 7.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Regular Season · Cincinnati
81 primary output · 47.3 efficiency · 12.6 usage
61.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati
53.6
88 primary · 23 efficiency · 14.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
37.9
38 primary · 33.9 efficiency · 3.7 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.