Player Stats

Chad Banschbach College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
207
Rushing yards
180
Receiving yards
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonCincinnati281810061.1
2015 Regular SeasonCincinnati2887216053.6
2016 Regular SeasonCincinnati6382711037.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

Cincinnati paired 81 primary output with 47.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 33.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

6.3

Efficiency

33.9

Usage

3.7

Consistency

63.7

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 0. Miami (OH): 11. South Florida: 6. Temple: 0. BYU: 11. UCF: 10

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 57.3. South Florida: 2 by 31.3. BYU: 4 by 24. UCF: 4 by 22.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins5.5 · Games = 2 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses6.8 · Games = 4 · +1.3 vs Wins