Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 16 primary output with 58.8 efficiency.
Player Stats
Malik Fountain College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 330
- TFL
- 19
- Sacks
- 3.5
- QB hurries
- 2
- Passes defended
- 5
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 13 | 8 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 59.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 13 | 82 | 9 | 1 | - | 1 | 0 | 59.8 |
| 2017 Postseason | Central Michigan | 13 | 8 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 29.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 13 | 81 | 2.5 | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 29.7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 12 | 151 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 78 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
58.8
Usage
14.1
Consistency
53.1
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 2. Kansas: 1. Northern Illinois: 2. Maine: 2. Michigan State: 1.5. Buffalo: 0. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Akron: 2. Eastern Michigan: 4. Bowling Green: 1. Toledo: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 4 by 36.7. Kansas: 13 by 60. Northern Illinois: 18 by 70. Maine: 10 by 61.7. Michigan State: 15 by 65. Buffalo: 11 by 45.8. Ball State: 10 by 41.7. Western Michigan: 15 by 50. Akron: 15 by 70. Eastern Michigan: 13 by 90. Bowling Green: 14 by 60. Toledo: 13 by 55
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2 · Games = 1 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 11 · -0.7 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Malik Fountain
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.