Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2014-2018Bowling Green
Jack Walz III
WR • 5'11" • 191 lbs • Cleveland, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jack Walz III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1415161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jack Walz III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Jack Walz III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 0. Unknown: 0. Northwestern: 0. Kent State: 0. Buffalo: 0. Toledo: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Losses0 · n=5
First Half0 · n=4 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · n=3 · +0 vs First Half
All Games0 · n=7
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Eastern Michigan
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
0
Primary metric
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Bowling Green
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7859
St. Edward · Lakewood, OH
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
0
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.