Player Stats

Connor White College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
678
Passing yards
499
Rushing yards
179
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonTexas State1614120052.9
2015 Regular SeasonTexas State530323568157.4
2016 Regular SeasonTexas State531422391154.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Texas State paired 303 primary output with 49 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 46.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State

Loss with 137 yards of offense and 51 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Texas State

Games

5

Primary Metric / G

62.8

Efficiency

46.3

Usage

14.8

Consistency

38.9

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston: 11. Idaho: 1. New Mexico State: 42. Troy: 123. Arkansas State: 137

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 4 by 62.3. Idaho: 1 by 10. New Mexico State: 7 by 59.4. Troy: 27 by 48.7. Arkansas State: 34 by 51

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half18 · Games = 3 · -112 vs Second Half
Second Half130 · Games = 2 · +112 vs First Half