Usage Score
36.7
Player Dossier
2014-2015Utah State
WR • 6'0" • Palmdale, CA, USA
Hunter Sharp reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
36.7
Efficiency
79.1
Consistency
62.9
Season Value
66.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Sharp, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Utah State. Hunter Sharp reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Utah State paired 835 primary output with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
75.9
Efficiency
79.1
Usage
36.7
Consistency
62.9
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 89. Washington: 74. Colorado State: 63. Fresno State: 99. Boise State: 42. San Diego State: 63. Wyoming: 23. New Mexico: 38. Air Force: 193. Nevada: 51. BYU: 100
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 11 by 53.9. Washington: 6 by 82.2. Colorado State: 4 by 100. Fresno State: 6 by 100. Boise State: 7 by 40. San Diego State: 4 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 5 by 50.7. Air Force: 13 by 99. Nevada: 7 by 48.6. BYU: 7 by 95.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/22 | vs AkronHigh volume | L 21-23 | — | 11 | 89 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs BYU100 receiving yards | L 28-51 | — | 7 | 100 | 12.8 | 14.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Nevada | W 31-27 | — | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-35 | — | 13 | 193 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 3 | 48 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ New Mexico | L 13-14 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Wyoming | W 58-27 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ San Diego State | L 14-48 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Boise State2+ TD | W 52-26 | — | 7 | 42 | 4.9 | 6 | 2 | 21 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Fresno State | W 56-14 | — | 6 | 99 | 14.3 | 16.50 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Colorado State | W 33-18 | — | 4 | 63 | 14.2 | 15.80 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Washington | L 17-31 | — | 6 | 74 | 10.1 | 12.30 | 0 | 49 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Utah State | 939 | 76.9 | 29.2 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah State | 939 | 76.9 | 29.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Utah State | 835 | 79.1 | 36.7 | -104 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah State | 835 | 79.1 | 36.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
193
Primary metric
193 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
#2
Air Force
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
173
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas State
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 96.3 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Utah State
835 primary output · 79.1 efficiency · 36.7 usage
66.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Utah State
66.6
835 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 36.7 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Utah State
61.2
939 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 29.2 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7
Antelope Valley · Lancaster, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,774
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Hunter Sharp quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit