Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Kansas State paired 438 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Postseason | Kansas State | 13 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 66.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kansas State | 13 | 27 | 298 | 3 | 66.2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kansas State | 13 | 4 | 25 | 1 | 77.9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kansas State | 13 | 41 | 413 | 5 | 77.9 |
| 2017 Postseason | Kansas State | 9 | 5 | 49 | 1 | 56.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kansas State | 9 | 17 | 147 | 0 | 56.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | App State | 11 | 22 | 299 | 5 | 56.3 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Kansas State paired 438 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kansas State, App State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Gardner-Webb
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
27.2
Efficiency
65.9
Usage
16.3
Consistency
36.6
Best Game by takeover score
Gardner-Webb
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 35. Charlotte: 7. Gardner-Webb: 111. Arkansas State: 9. Louisiana: 20. Georgia Southern: 0. Coastal Carolina: 55. Texas State: 38. Georgia State: 21. Troy: 8. Louisiana: -5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 1 by 46.7. Gardner-Webb: 4 by 100. Arkansas State: 1 by 60. Louisiana: 3 by 44.4. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 91.7. Texas State: 4 by 63.3. Georgia State: 1 by 100. Troy: 1 by 53.3. Louisiana: 1 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.