Player Stats

Larry Rose III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
5,714
Rushing yards
4,557
Receiving yards
1,157
Touchdowns
42

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State101,2741,1021721071.5
2015 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State121,9341,6512831683.2
2016 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State91,045865180468.5
2017 PostseasonNew Mexico State1218013248177.2
2017 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State121,2818074741177.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

New Mexico State paired 1,934 primary output with 67.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Win with 184 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · New Mexico State

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

121.8

Efficiency

55.6

Usage

34.5

Consistency

79

Best Game by takeover score

UTEP

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 180. Arizona State: 100. New Mexico: 147. Troy: 91. UTEP: 184. Arkansas: 47. App State: 108. Arkansas State: 55. Texas State: 165. Louisiana: 128. Idaho: 109. South Alabama: 147

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 22 by 84.1. Arizona State: 16 by 54.9. New Mexico: 28 by 51.3. Troy: 18 by 57. UTEP: 21 by 86.5. Arkansas: 10 by 39.1. App State: 24 by 47. Arkansas State: 19 by 31.2. Texas State: 23 by 56.5. Louisiana: 15 by 56.6. Idaho: 25 by 46.6. South Alabama: 21 by 56.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins155.3 · Games = 6 · +67.2 vs Losses
Losses88.2 · Games = 6 · -67.2 vs Wins