Usage Score
16.9
Player Dossier
2014-2015UL Monroe
Kaylon Watson
RB • 6'0" • Mexia, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Kaylon Watson leans balanced backfield option traits and 37.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
37.2
Consistency
47.2
Season Value
50.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UL Monroe
1415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- UL Monroe
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kaylon Watson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UL Monroe. Kaylon Watson leans balanced backfield option traits and 37.2 efficiency.
Kaylon Watson played RB for UL Monroe. Across 2 tracked seasons, Kaylon Watson recorded 367 rushing yards, 199 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with UL Monroe.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UL Monroe paired 519 primary output with 37.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 37.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · UL Monroe
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
39.9
Efficiency
37.2
Usage
16.9
Consistency
47.2
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 17. Unknown: 50. Alabama: 12. Georgia Southern: 32. Tulsa: 74. App State: 88. Idaho: 8. Louisiana: 85. Troy: 14. Arkansas State: -2. Texas State: 16. Hawai'i: 31. New Mexico State: 94
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 7 by 23.9. Unknown: 10 by 45.1. Alabama: 7 by 19.6. Georgia Southern: 10 by 33.3. Tulsa: 16 by 57.3. App State: 13 by 54.9. Idaho: 7 by 11. Louisiana: 8 by 72.8. Troy: 9 by 12.7. Arkansas State: 5 by 0. Texas State: 4 by 41.7. Hawai'i: 8 by 40.4. New Mexico State: 10 by 71.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses34.1 · Games = 11
First Half40.1 · Games = 7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half39.7 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs First Half
All Games39.9 · Games = 13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
72.8 vs Louisiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/5 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-35 | 9 | 46 | 5.10 | 0 | 1 | 48 | 9.4 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Hawai'i | L 26-28 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Fri 11/20 | @ Texas State | L 3-16 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Arkansas State | L 21-59 | 4 | -3 | -0.80 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -0.4 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Troy | L 14-51 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 1.6 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Louisiana | L 24-30 | 7 | 32 | 4.60 | 0 | 1 | 53 | 10.6 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Idaho | L 13-27 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1.1 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs App State | L 14-59 | 11 | 47 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 41 | 6.8 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Tulsa | L 24-34 | 12 | 73 | 6.10 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4.6 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Georgia Southern | L 31-51 | 10 | 32 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Alabama | L 0-34 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1.7 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 5 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Georgia | L 14-51 | 5 | 11 | 2.20 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UL Monroe
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 47 | 36.5 | 5.8 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 519 | 37.2 | 16.9 | 472 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
94
Primary metric
94 scrimmage yards and 20 usage.
#2
Louisiana
85
Primary metric
Loss with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 16 usage.
#3
App State
88
Primary metric
Loss with 88 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
88 scrimmage yards and 22.8 usage.
#4
Tulsa
74
Primary metric
Loss with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 29.6 usage.
#5
Kentucky
32
Primary metric
Loss with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 13.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · UL Monroe
519 primary output · 37.2 efficiency · 16.9 usage
50.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · UL Monroe
27.8
47 primary · 36.5 efficiency · 5.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7685
Mexia · Mexia, TX
- Committed To
- UL Monroe
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
566
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.