Usage Score
0.9
Player Dossier
2014-2016Idaho
Tueni Lupeamanu
RB
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Tueni Lupeamanu leans balanced backfield option traits and 18.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
18.2
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
10.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Idaho
14151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Idaho
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tueni Lupeamanu, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Idaho. Tueni Lupeamanu leans balanced backfield option traits and 18.2 efficiency.
Tueni Lupeamanu played RB for Idaho. Across 3 tracked seasons, Tueni Lupeamanu recorded 11 rushing yards, 74 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Idaho.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Idaho paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 18.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia State
Win with 4 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Idaho
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
0.8
Efficiency
18.2
Usage
0.9
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado State: 3. Unknown: 0. Washington: 0. Washington State: 0. UNLV: 0. Troy: 0. UL Monroe: 0. New Mexico State: 0. App State: 0. Louisiana: 0. Texas State: 2. South Alabama: 2. Georgia State: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado State: 1 by 31.3. Texas State: 2 by 10.4. South Alabama: 2 by 10.4. Georgia State: 2 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.4 · Games = 8 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · Games = 7 · -0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 6 · +0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia State
Best efficiency game
31.3 vs Colorado State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | @ Colorado State | W 61-50 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Georgia State | W 37-12 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs South Alabama | W 38-31 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Texas State2+ TD | W 47-14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Louisiana | W 23-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ App State | L 19-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs New Mexico State | W 55-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UL Monroe | W 34-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Troy | L 13-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | @ UNLV | W 33-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Washington State | L 6-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Washington | L 14-59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Idaho
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Idaho | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Idaho | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Idaho | 11 | 18.2 | 0.9 | 11 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Idaho | 11 | 18.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia State
Win with 4 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
4
Primary metric
4 scrimmage yards and 3.3 usage.
#2
Colorado State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
3 scrimmage yards and 1.4 usage.
#3
South Alabama
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
2 scrimmage yards and 3.8 usage.
#4
Texas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
2 scrimmage yards and 3 usage.
#5
App State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 0 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Idaho
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0 usage
50
#2
2016 Postseason · Idaho
10.7
11 primary · 18.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Idaho
10.7
11 primary · 18.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7533
Herriman · Herriman, UT
- Committed To
- Idaho
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
11
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.