Usage Score
17.6
Player Dossier
2014-2017UTEP
Tyler Batson
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Spring, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tyler Batson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78
Consistency
39.3
Season Value
56.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP
14151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Batson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP. Tyler Batson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTEP paired 395 primary output with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
33.6
Efficiency
78
Usage
17.6
Consistency
39.3
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 6. Rice: 16. Arizona: 20. New Mexico State: 28. Army: 80. Western Kentucky: 10. Southern Miss: 9. UTSA: 45. North Texas: 8. Louisiana Tech: 94. UAB: 54
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 40. Rice: 1 by 100. Arizona: 3 by 44.4. New Mexico State: 2 by 93.3. Army: 5 by 100. Western Kentucky: 1 by 66.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 60. UTSA: 2 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 53.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. UAB: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses33.6 · n=11
First Half26.7 · n=6 · -15.3 vs Second Half
Second Half42 · n=5 · +15.3 vs First Half
All Games33.6 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ UAB | L 7-28 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | — | 2 | 94 | 47 | 47 | 1 | 83 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ North Texas | L 10-45 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/29 | vs UTSA | L 14-31 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Southern Miss | L 0-24 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | L 14-15 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Army | L 21-35 | — | 5 | 80 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ New Mexico State | L 14-41 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Arizona | L 16-63 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Rice | L 14-31 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 7-56 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 11 | 73.3 | 5.6 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 395 | 77.1 | 13 | 384 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 114 | 83.3 | 8.6 | -281 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 370 | 78 | 17.6 | 256 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80
Primary metric
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
143
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
395 primary output · 77.1 efficiency · 13 usage
59.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
56.9
370 primary · 78 efficiency · 17.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
45.4
11 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7719
Westfield · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
890
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.