Usage / Role
0%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2017UTEP
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Rio Rancho, NM, USA
Sterling Napier reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
0%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
0
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
0
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
10
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Sterling Napier, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP. Sterling Napier reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 38.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 62.9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Related Context
Sterling Napier played TE for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Sterling Napier recorded 10 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
— vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 10/29 | vs UTSA | L 14-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | 13.3 | 5 | 2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 8 | 26.7 | 7.4 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | -8 |
#1 Featured game
@ Florida Atlantic
Week 11 · L 31-35 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4
Receiving Yards
50.8 takeover
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#2
vs Southern Miss
Week 4 · L 7-34 · Conference game
4
Receiving Yards
50.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#3
vs Florida Atlantic
Week 8 · W 27-17 · Conference game
2
Receiving Yards
43.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
2 receiving yards with a 13.3 efficiency score.
#4
vs UTSA
Week 9 · L 14-31 · Conference game
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
62.9
8 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
38.8
2 primary · 13.3 efficiency · 5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.