Player Stats

Ryan Metz College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
3,688
Passing yards
3,488
Rushing yards
200
Touchdowns
30

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonUTEP00000-
2015 Regular SeasonUTEP81,021900121751.9
2016 Regular SeasonUTEP101,4161,375411465.9
2017 Regular SeasonUTEP8629637-8539.2
2018 Regular SeasonUTEP662257646438.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

UTEP paired 1,416 primary output with 61.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 45.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

6

Primary Metric / G

103.7

Efficiency

45.1

Usage

17.9

Consistency

26.5

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northern Arizona: -16. UNLV: 75. Tennessee: 0. UTSA: 21. North Texas: 350. Louisiana Tech: 192

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Arizona: 8 by 17.9. UNLV: 14 by 46.9. Tennessee: 1 by 33.3. UTSA: 4 by 51.4. North Texas: 43 by 60.1. Louisiana Tech: 29 by 61.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half19.7 · Games = 3 · -168 vs Second Half
Second Half187.7 · Games = 3 · +168 vs First Half