Player Stats

KeeSean Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,463
Receptions
275
Touchdowns
24

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonFresno State0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonFresno State1137337253.6
2016 Regular SeasonFresno State1266773677.2
2017 PostseasonFresno State14895079.2
2017 Regular SeasonFresno State1469918879.2
2018 PostseasonFresno State14233090.3
2018 Regular SeasonFresno State14931,307890.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Fresno State paired 1,340 primary output with 84.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 84.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: San José State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Fresno State

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

95.7

Efficiency

84.5

Usage

31.1

Consistency

76.8

Best Game by takeover score

San José State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 33. Idaho: 118. Minnesota: 89. UCLA: 85. Toledo: 102. Nevada: 65. Wyoming: 51. New Mexico: 149. Hawai'i: 102. UNLV: 97. Boise State: 95. San Diego State: 141. San José State: 173. Boise State: 40

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 2 by 100. Idaho: 6 by 100. Minnesota: 6 by 98.9. UCLA: 8 by 70.8. Toledo: 6 by 100. Nevada: 7 by 61.9. Wyoming: 5 by 68. New Mexico: 8 by 100. Hawai'i: 8 by 85. UNLV: 8 by 80.8. Boise State: 8 by 79.2. San Diego State: 10 by 94. San José State: 7 by 100. Boise State: 6 by 44.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins96.3 · Games = 12 · +4.3 vs Losses
Losses92 · Games = 2 · -4.3 vs Wins