Player Stats

Deron Thompson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
392
Rushing yards
360
Receiving yards
32
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonColorado State00000-
2013 Regular SeasonColorado State00000-
2014 Regular SeasonColorado State486860036.5
2015 Regular SeasonColorado State249490038.8
2016 Regular SeasonKansas00000-
2017 Regular SeasonKansas81138627046.1
2018 Regular SeasonKansas31441395166.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Kansas paired 144 primary output with 94.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 94.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado State, Kansas.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers

Win with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Kansas

Games

3

Scrimmage Yards / G

48

Efficiency

94.4

Usage

5.5

Consistency

56.8

Best Game by takeover score

Rutgers

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 32. Rutgers: 75. Texas Tech: 37

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 4 by 83.3. Rutgers: 4 by 100. Texas Tech: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.5 · Games = 2 · +16.5 vs Losses
Losses37 · Games = 1 · -16.5 vs Wins