Player Stats

A.J. Richardson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,474
Receptions
99
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonBoise State0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonBoise State610113041.8
2016 Regular SeasonBoise State2242144
2017 Regular SeasonBoise State1133494259.9
2018 Regular SeasonBoise State1354825876.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Boise State paired 825 primary output with 81 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 81 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Boise State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

63.5

Efficiency

81

Usage

17.5

Consistency

68

Best Game by takeover score

Colorado State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 30. UConn: 100. Oklahoma State: 70. Wyoming: 113. San Diego State: 38. Nevada: 79. Colorado State: 137. Air Force: 33. BYU: 53. Fresno State: 66. New Mexico: 8. Utah State: 77. Fresno State: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 3 by 66.7. UConn: 3 by 100. Oklahoma State: 6 by 77.8. Wyoming: 6 by 100. San Diego State: 5 by 50.7. Nevada: 4 by 100. Colorado State: 6 by 100. Air Force: 2 by 100. BYU: 4 by 88.3. Fresno State: 5 by 88. New Mexico: 1 by 53.3. Utah State: 4 by 100. Fresno State: 5 by 28

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins69.6 · Games = 10 · +26.6 vs Losses
Losses43 · Games = 3 · -26.6 vs Wins