Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2014-2017Wake Forest
Devin Pike
TE • 6'6" • 250 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Devin Pike reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
30
Consistency
57.4
Season Value
30.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
14151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Pike, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Devin Pike reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 34 primary output with 24.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 30 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
4.5
Efficiency
30
Usage
8.7
Consistency
57.4
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 8. Florida State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
All Games4.5 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Duke
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 34 | 24.2 | 8.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | -34 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 9 | 30 | 8.7 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | -9 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8
Primary metric
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
26
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 43.3 efficiency score.
#3
Boston College
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#4
Florida State
1
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
1 receiving yards with a 6.7 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
34 primary output · 24.2 efficiency · 8.2 usage
40.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Wake Forest
30.5
9 primary · 30 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Wake Forest
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.873
Riverdale · Murfreesboro, TN
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
43
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.