Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2014-2017Wake Forest
Jaboree Williams
LB • 6'0" • 245 lbs • Deerfield Beach, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jaboree Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43 disruption score.
Efficiency
43
Consistency
57.2
Season Value
34.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Wake Forest
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaboree Williams, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Wake Forest. Jaboree Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 20.5 primary output with 43 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 43 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
43
Usage
11.9
Consistency
57.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 1. Unknown: 2. Boston College: 4. Utah State: 2. App State: 1. Florida State: 0. Clemson: 2. Georgia Tech: 0. Louisville: 4. Notre Dame: 0.5. Syracuse: 2. NC State: 0. Duke: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 11 by 55.8. Unknown: 4 by 36.7. Boston College: 7 by 69.2. Utah State: 1 by 24.2. App State: 7 by 39.2. Florida State: 2 by 8.3. Clemson: 5 by 40.8. Georgia Tech: 5 by 20.8. Louisville: 9 by 77.5. Notre Dame: 5 by 25.8. Syracuse: 8 by 53.3. NC State: 9 by 37.5. Duke: 12 by 70
Split Comparison
Wins2 · n=7 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · n=5 · -1.1 vs Wins
First Half1.7 · n=7 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
77.5 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ Texas A&M10+ tackles | W 55-52 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Duke10+ tackles · Splash game | L 23-31 | 12 | 9 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs NC State | W 30-24 | 9 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ SyracuseSplash game | W 64-43 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Notre Dame | L 37-48 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs LouisvilleSplash game | W 42-32 | 9 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Georgia Tech | L 24-38 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ ClemsonSplash game | L 14-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Florida State | L 19-26 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ App State | W 20-19 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Utah State | W 46-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Boston CollegeSplash game | W 34-10 | 7 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 7.5 | 25 | 7.9 | 7.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 7.5 | 25 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wake Forest | 20.5 | 43 | 11.9 | 13 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 20.5 | 43 | 11.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.2 takeover score.
#2
Boston College
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#3
Louisville
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.8 takeover score.
#4
Duke
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#5
Syracuse
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Wake Forest
20.5 primary output · 43 efficiency · 11.9 usage
34.9
#2
2017 Regular Season · Wake Forest
34.9
20.5 primary · 43 efficiency · 11.9 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Wake Forest
13.5
7.5 primary · 25 efficiency · 7.9 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
6
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8208
Fort Lauderdale · Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
121
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.