Player Stats

Demetrius Kemp College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
137
TFL
8
Sacks
3
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonWake Forest00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonWake Forest10-0--043.9
2016 PostseasonWake Forest1030.50--041.4
2016 Regular SeasonWake Forest10283.5111041.4
2017 PostseasonWake Forest135-0--038.9
2017 Regular SeasonWake Forest13581.5121038.9
2018 PostseasonWake Forest110-0--056
2018 Regular SeasonWake Forest11432.5131056

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Wake Forest paired 8.5 primary output with 24.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 24.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Wake Forest

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

24.9

Usage

5.7

Consistency

51.5

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 1. Tulane: 0. Towson: 1. Boston College: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Rice: 2.5. Clemson: 1. Florida State: 1. Louisville: 2. Syracuse: 0. Duke: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 4 by 16.7. Towson: 5 by 30.8. Boston College: 3 by 12.5. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 7 by 54.2. Clemson: 5 by 30.8. Florida State: 7 by 39.2. Louisville: 6 by 45. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5. Duke: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.1 · Games = 6 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Wins