Player Stats

Brady Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
734
Receptions
62
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonUTSA0-00-
2014 Regular SeasonUTSA2535146.2
2015 Regular SeasonUTSA4552049.2
2016 PostseasonUTSA11228071.3
2016 Regular SeasonUTSA1124294471.3
2017 Regular SeasonUTSA1126325264.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

UTSA paired 322 primary output with 75.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · UTSA

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

29.5

Efficiency

70.3

Usage

14.2

Consistency

39.3

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 3. Southern: 65. Texas State: 75. Southern Miss: 12. North Texas: 23. Rice: 57. UTEP: 14. Florida International: 12. UAB: 32. Marshall: 14. Louisiana Tech: 18

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 1 by 20. Southern: 3 by 100. Texas State: 3 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 40. North Texas: 3 by 51.1. Rice: 4 by 95. UTEP: 1 by 93.3. Florida International: 1 by 80. UAB: 3 by 71.1. Marshall: 4 by 23.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38 · Games = 6 · +18.6 vs Losses
Losses19.4 · Games = 5 · -18.6 vs Wins