Player Dossier

2014-2018

UTSA

Greg Campbell Jr.

WR • 6'1" • 190 lbs • Humble, TX, USA

Alpha targetPossession profile

Greg Campbell Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

30.5

Efficiency

64.2

Consistency

59

Season Value

62.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA

1415161718

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
UTSA
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Greg Campbell Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA. Greg Campbell Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

UTSA paired 658 primary output with 64.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 64.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · UTSA

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

59.8

Efficiency

64.2

Usage

30.5

Consistency

59

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 34. Baylor: 62. Kansas State: 41. Texas State: 71. UTEP: 61. Rice: 0. Southern Miss: 44. UAB: 62. Florida International: 13. Marshall: 84. North Texas: 186

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 4 by 56.7. Baylor: 4 by 100. Kansas State: 6 by 45.6. Texas State: 7 by 67.6. UTEP: 4 by 100. Rice: 1 by 0. Southern Miss: 5 by 58.7. UAB: 6 by 68.9. Florida International: 3 by 28.9. Marshall: 7 by 80. North Texas: 11 by 100

Split Comparison

Wins44 · n=3 · -21.8 vs Losses
Losses65.8 · n=8 · +21.8 vs Wins
First Half44.8 · n=6 · -33.0 vs Second Half
Second Half77.8 · n=5 · +33.0 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

North Texas

Best efficiency game

100 vs North Texas

Result
Sun 11/25vs North Texas100 receiving yards · High volumeL 21-241118616.916.90044
Sat 11/17@ MarshallL 0-237841212020
Sun 11/11vs Florida InternationalL 7-453134.34.3008
Sat 11/3@ UABL 3-5266210.310.30015
Sat 10/20@ Southern MissL 17-275448.88.80127
Sat 10/6@ RiceW 20-310-1000
Sat 9/29vs UTEPW 30-2146113.715.30019
Sat 9/22vs Texas StateW 25-2177110.110.10022
Sat 9/15@ Kansas StateL 17-4164166.80110
Sat 9/8vs BaylorL 20-3746213.815.50022
Sun 9/2@ Arizona StateL 7-4943468.50018

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    UTSA

    2014-2018

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20142015201620172018
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2014 Regular SeasonUTSA0
2015 Regular SeasonUTSA3206.33
2016 Regular SeasonUTSA3345.69.830
2017 Regular SeasonUTSA30075.518.1267
2018 Regular SeasonUTSA65864.230.5358

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

North Texas

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

186

Primary metric

186 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Southern Miss

108

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

108 receiving yards with a 72 efficiency score.

#3

Colorado State

29

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.

#4

Marshall

84

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.

#5

Unknown

50

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2018 Regular Season · UTSA

658 primary output · 64.2 efficiency · 30.5 usage

62.4

#2

2017 Regular Season · UTSA

42.1

300 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 18.1 usage

#3

2016 Regular Season · UTSA

29.6

33 primary · 45.6 efficiency · 9.8 usage

Milestones

2

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2014 · Rating 0.7611

Atascocita · Humble, TX

Committed To
UTSA
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2014

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

994

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Greg Campbell Jr. quick answers

Recruiting profile

2-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
5
Career receiving yards
994