Player Stats

Michael Thomas College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,983
Receptions
112
Touchdowns
20

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss1241592655.2
2015 PostseasonSouthern Miss139190287.4
2015 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss13621,2011287.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Southern Miss paired 1,391 primary output with 95.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 95.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Southern Miss

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

107

Efficiency

95.8

Usage

22.8

Consistency

77.8

Best Game by takeover score

Washington

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington: 190. Mississippi State: 33. Texas State: 27. Nebraska: 121. North Texas: 155. Marshall: 109. UTSA: 103. Charlotte: 105. UTEP: 84. Rice: 126. Old Dominion: 86. Louisiana Tech: 162. Western Kentucky: 90

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 9 by 100. Mississippi State: 4 by 55. Texas State: 2 by 90. Nebraska: 5 by 100. North Texas: 7 by 100. Marshall: 7 by 100. UTSA: 5 by 100. Charlotte: 6 by 100. UTEP: 4 by 100. Rice: 5 by 100. Old Dominion: 4 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 100. Western Kentucky: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins106 · Games = 8 · -2.6 vs Losses
Losses108.6 · Games = 5 · +2.6 vs Wins

Next best actions

Keep exploring Michael Thomas

Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.